The Role of the Grievance Committee

***THIS POST IS PART OF A SERIES DESIGNED TO HELP NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEYS BETTER UNDERSTAND THE NORTH CAROLINA GRIEVANCE PROCESS. STAY INFORMED ABOUT YOUR RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND WHAT TO EXPECT AT EACH STAGE***

If the North Carolina State Bar determines that a grievance warrants further review, it may be referred to the Grievance Committee. Understanding this step is key to knowing what happens next.

What Is the Grievance Committee?

The Grievance Committee is a panel of attorneys and non-attorneys who review cases that may involve ethical violations. They meet quarterly to assess evidence and determine appropriate actions.

Possible Outcomes from the Grievance Committee

After reviewing a case, the Grievance Committee may:

  1. Dismiss the case – If no violation is found.
  2. Issue a Letter of Caution – A non-disciplinary warning about the conduct in question.
  3. Issue an Admonition, Reprimand, or Censure – Forms of public or private discipline that indicate a violation occurred.
  4. Refer the case to the Disciplinary Hearing Commission (DHC) – If serious misconduct is suspected, the case may proceed to a formal trial.

How Should You Prepare If Your Case Goes to the Committee?

  • Ensure your response was thorough and professional – The Committee will review your original grievance response.
  • Seek legal representation – If disciplinary action is possible, having an experienced ethics attorney is advisable.
  • Understand the possible outcomes – Not all referrals result in severe discipline, but being prepared is crucial.

In the next post, we’ll discuss what happens if your case is referred to the Disciplinary Hearing Commission (DHC) and what to expect in a formal ethics trial.